nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair on the offender plus the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which range depending within the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case regulation citation inside a state court is probably not correct, and even accepted, for the U.
As being the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is arrived at, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The a good amount of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it truly is made distinct that police is free to take action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities subject to legislation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. If the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, plus they shall be assigned non-discipline duties in the interim period. Read more
The official court record is maintained with the court of record. Copies of case file documents are usually not offered around the search site and will need to generally be ordered from the court of record.
Though there isn't any prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds minor sway. Still, if there is no precedent during the home state, relevant case legislation from another state could be regarded as via the court.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight given to any reported judgment may well depend upon the reputation of both the reporter plus the judges.[7]
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons having their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to get inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude check here but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to complete absent with the candidature with the petitioner. Read more
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a nicely-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.
twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons acquiring their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to perform away with the candidature in the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government policies for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university and to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. For that reason, this petition is admissible based on set up court precedents, as well as the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
Any court might request to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different conclusion. The validity of such a distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to some higher court.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
States also normally have courts that manage only a specific subset of legal matters, for instance family regulation and probate. Case regulation, also known as precedent or common regulation, will be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending within the relationship between the deciding court along with the precedent, case legislation could be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for your Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting in California (whether a federal or state court) isn't strictly bound to follow the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by 1 district court in Ny is not really binding on another district court, but the first court’s reasoning could possibly help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions because of the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more